The relevance of this article is to understand the problem of studying the visual images of graffiti in the socio-cultural space of the city. The article substantiates the relevance of the appeal to the ecology of urban space as one of the modern directions of urban environment research. Nowadays graffiti has become an integral part of modern culture and way of life, a special kind of art, which can be both an art object and an act of vandalism, violating the ecology of the city space. The aim of the study is to analyze the features in the use of different styles of graffiti in the urban environment in the aspect of the ecology of urban space. The leading method for the study of this problem is the method of analysis of photographs, which contributes to the effective identification of types of graffiti and their impact on the ecology of urban space. The article analyzes the ecology of urban space and the impact of graffiti on it. The basic styles of graffiti are allocated; the dominating and less used graffiti in social and cultural space of the city are defined. The features of the location of graffiti on the streets of the metropolis are considered. The most commonly used size of graffiti in the city is shown. Graffiti in different areas of the urban environment are analyzed. The novelty and originality of the study lies in the fact that for the first time the eco-psychological problems of space organization associated with the use of graffiti are analyzed (visual images in the urban environment, deforming or decorating the visual space of the city). The importance of graffiti for the city as one of the factors influencing the ecology of urban space is revealed. It is revealed that using graffiti in the urban space contributes to social interaction between man and the ecology of the city. It is shown that the introduction of harmonious colors details on the flat ends of buildings, their implementing into the subject forms and lines, in most cases, makes a positive contribution to the ecological space of the metropolis and helps people to distract from their internal worries. The styles of graffiti, which are most famous and popular in the course of graffiti, affecting the ecology of urban space (Writing, Bombing, Tagging, Scratching, Street art, and 3D graffiti) are considered. It is shown that the most popular in use are three styles: Tagging, Writing and Street Art. The styles of Tagging and Writing negatively affect the ecology of the socio-cultural space of the city, the style of Street Art influences positively and is often perceived as an art object. It is revealed that the least popular styles in the city are Bombing, Scratching and 3D graffiti. It is shown that the styles of bombing and Scratching have a negative impact on the ecology of the socio-cultural space of the city, the style of 3D graffiti has a positive impact and is considered an art object. It is shown that according to the size of drawings graffiti artists prefer works in small and medium sizes. It is revealed that graffiti works in a large format are much fewer. It is determined that on the outskirts of the districts graffiti is found much more than in the center of the metropolis. The data obtained in this work can be used in environmental psychology, visual ecology, labor psychology, social psychology, pedagogy, sociology, as well as for further theoretical development of this issue.


  • Alisov DA (1997) Urbanization and culture. Urban culture of Siberia: history and modernity. Omsk.
  • Alisov EA, Cherdymova EI, Trubina GF, Yakushev AN, Zhdanov SP, Popova OV, Kobzar-Frolova MN (2018) Study of Dominant Type of Student Ecological Focus. Ekoloji, 27(106): 357-362.
  • Ananyev BG (2001) Man as an object of knowledge. St.Petersburg: Peter publishing house.
  • Atabekova AA, Stepanova VV, Udina NN, Gorbatenko OG, Shoustikova TV (2017) Interpreting in the context of refugee migration: Emerging professional challenges and needs. XLinguae 10(4): 184-195
  • Baibarin AA, Mashkin NA, Shelengovskiy PG (2016) The northwest Caucasus from ancient times to the 19th century: a historiographical review of the recent publications in the periodicals. Rusin, 46(4): 119-140.
  • Bourdieu P (1993) Sociology of politics. Moscow: Socio-Logos publishing house.
  • Bubnova IS, Khvatova MA, Chernik VE, Popova OV, Prokopyev AI, Naumov PYu, Babarykin OV (2018) Research of professional activity features of ecologist at carrying out public ecological examination. Ekoloji, 106: 999-1006, Article No: e106183.
  • Cherdymova EI, Afanasjeva SA, Parkhomenko AG, Ponyavina MB, Yulova ES, Nesmeianova IA, Skutelnik OA (2018) Student ecological consciousness as determining component of ecological-oriented activity. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences Eurasia J Biosci, 12: 167-174
  • Cherdymova EI, Prokopyev AI, Karpenkova NV, Pravkin SA, Ponomareva NS, Kanyaeva OM, Ryazapova LZ, Anufriev AF (2019) EcoArt Therapy as a Factor of Students’ Environmental Consciousness Development. Ekoloji, 28(107): 687-693
  • Cornilov GA, Ilkevich KB, Shalomova EV, Kartushina IG, Musharatsky ML, Mashkin NA, Altukhov SA (2019) Features of alcohol consumption motives and practices by full-time and part-time training students. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 7(3): 438-444.
  • Cornilov GA, Ilkevich KB, Shalomova EV, Kartushina IG, Musharatsky ML, Mashkin NA, Altukhov SA (2019) Features of alcohol consumption motives and practices by full-time and part-time training students. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 7(3): 438-444.
  • Filin VA (2006) Video Ecology. What is good for eye and what is bad. Moscow: Videoecology publishing house.
  • Firsova I, Vasbieva D, Prokopyev AI, Zykin ES, Matvienko VV (2018) Development of consumers’ behavior business model on energy market. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(4): 227-233.
  • Gorbunov MA, Fadeeva AV, Shirshikov VB, Matveev PA, Popova OV, Mitrofanova MYu, Bakaeva JYu, Mashkin NA (2019) Nature protection potential of wildlife sanctuary: Protection and preservation of its ecological biodiversity. Ekoloji, 107: 5033-5037, Article No: e107576.
  • Iovlev VI (1996) Ecopsychology for architects: process and form student book. Ekaterinburg: Architecton publishing house.
  • Iovlev VI (2006) Architectural space and ecology. Ekaterinburg: Architecton publishing house.
  • Kazakova GM (2007) Regional and provincial cultures: on essential characteristics. Bulletin of Moscow state University of culture and arts, 3: 112.
  • Kurguzov VL (2002) on the concept of cultural space and the problem of self-identification of its regional sample. Cultural space of Eastern Siberia and Mongolia. Proceedings of the international. Science-practical conference. Ulan-Ude, pp. 27.
  • Kuznetsova AG (2019) Meet: visual ecology. URL: http://www.archjournal.ru/rus/07%2048%202-008/znakomtes.htm. Date of access: 10.12.2019
  • Kuznetsova NV, Soloviev AA, Botasheva LKh, Lebedev IA, Sarkisyan KS, Kurdyumov VI, Chistyakov KA, Prokopyev AI (2018) Bachelors safety culture formation in the field of environmental protection. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences, 12(2): 157-166.
  • Máhrik T, Kralik R, Tavilla I (2018) Ethics in the light of subjectivity –Kierkegaard and Levinas. Astra Salvensis, Supplement 2: Proceedings of the - IV International Forum on Teacher Education‖, 22-24 May 2018, pp. 488-500.
  • Mikulina EM (2013) Architectural ecology. Moscow: Academia.
  • Mukhametshin RZ, Kryukova NI, Beloborodova AV, Grinenko AV & Popova OV (2019) Implementation of efficient energy policy in Russia: Energy consumption monitoring and problem analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(4): 224-232.
  • Murzina IL (2006) Ural Culture: essays on the formation and development of regional culture. Student book for high schools. Ekaterinburg: Forum-kniga.
  • Mutavchi EP, Prokopyev AI, Kostyleva GV, Blinov LV, Fedorov VV, Polichka AE (2018). Scientific - methodical resource of student training and vocational motivation development in university. Espacios, 39(20): 15.
  • Podymov NA, Nikoghosyan MA, Stolyarova AN, Narutto SV, Mashkin NA, Martynenko SE, Paznikova ZI, Varenik PK (2019) University New Educational Reality in Disruptive Technologies Context. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 7(4): 664-668.
  • Pyatkova NL (1997) Space in primitive culture: author’s review: PhD Thesis. Chelyabinsk.
  • Rubinstein SL (2005) Fundamentals of General psychology. St.Petersburg: Publishing house.
  • Runge VF, Manusevich YuP (2005) Ergonomics in environment design. Moscow: Architecture-s publishing house.
  • Ryabchenko ON, Prokopyev AI, Romanchenko LN, Korzhuev AV, Krokhina JA (2018) Social and philosophical understanding of national and civic identity in the context of interethnic and interreligious conflict risks. XLinguae, 11(2): 359-369.
  • Saurbaeva AM (2013) Visual ecology as a factor in the development of harmonious architecture. VIII international scientific conference of students and young scientists “Science and education-2013”. Moscow, pp. 152.
  • Sorokin P (1992) Man, civilization, society. Moscow: Politizdat publishing house.
  • Sorokoumova EA, Cherdymova EI, Rezvantseva MO, Kochneva LV, Latysheva VV, Perkova EP (2019) Environmental and Social Practices of Old Stuff Use and Disposal by Students. Ekoloji, 28(107): 5065-5069
  • Tsabolova OR, Cherdymova EI, Ilyin AN, Zhukova MA, Tsopanova IG, Krasnova LN, Mashkin NA, Bugaeva TK (2019) Ecology of psycho-emotional climate in labor collectives: Factors, problems and prospects of development. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences Eurasia J Biosci, 13: 2027-2032.
  • Vityuk EYu (2017) Ecological approach in urban futurology. Architecton, 2(2): 154-165. URL: http://archvuz.ru/2017_2/2. Date of access: 01.12.2019.
  • Voloboev AN (2009) Theoretical approaches to the study of graphic images in the adolescent-youth environment. Bulletin of University. (State University of management), 6: 25-27.
  • Vorontsova ON (2019) Visual ecology. Psychology of perception of architecture, design and environment. Retrieved from http://elib.osu.ru/bitstream/123456789/2461/1/elibrary_28976962_54-260842.pdf
  • Yanushkina YuV (2014) Visual-kinesthetic ecology of public spaces of the modern city. Bulletin of Volgograd state University, 3(23): 71-76.


This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.