The role of psychology students’ reflexivity in securing professional success
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 2019 - Volume 13 Issue 2, pp. 2051-2056
  • Published Online: 07 Dec 2019
  • Article Views: 275 | Article Download: 200
  • Open Access Full Text (PDF)
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Kayasheva OI, Khanova ZG. The role of psychology students’ reflexivity in securing professional success. Eurasia J Biosci. 2019;13(2), 2051-2056.

APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Kayasheva & Khanova, 2019)
Reference: Kayasheva, O. I., & Khanova, Z. G. (2019). The role of psychology students’ reflexivity in securing professional success. Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 13(2), 2051-2056.

In-text citation: (Kayasheva and Khanova, 2019)
Reference: Kayasheva, Olga I., and Zoya G. Khanova. "The role of psychology students’ reflexivity in securing professional success". Eurasian Journal of Biosciences 2019 13 no. 2 (2019): 2051-2056.

In-text citation: (Kayasheva and Khanova, 2019)
Reference: Kayasheva, O. I., and Khanova, Z. G. (2019). The role of psychology students’ reflexivity in securing professional success. Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 13(2), pp. 2051-2056.

In-text citation: (Kayasheva and Khanova, 2019)
Reference: Kayasheva, Olga I. et al. "The role of psychology students’ reflexivity in securing professional success". Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019, pp. 2051-2056.

In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Kayasheva OI, Khanova ZG. The role of psychology students’ reflexivity in securing professional success. Eurasia J Biosci. 2019;13(2):2051-6.


One of the defining roles in the evolvement of successful professionals belongs to the reflexivity of students of the higher educational institutions. Reflexivity implies the ability of students to analyze and resolve challenging situations in their professional activity, reveal their personal peculiarities that contribute to or hinder their professional progress, comprehend their place in the professional world. Reflexivity is an important regulative component of the personality. It is necessary to distinguish between the constructive and non-constructive reflexivity. The constructive reflexivity is necessary for students to reveal their strengths and weaknesses in professional activity, efficiently adjust their behavioral strategies depending on the pursued professional goals and objectives. Reflexivity of students is developed through a system of specially organized problem-oriented classes and ensures the necessary level of training for future professionals. This paper suggests a three-stage model for developing reflexivity in psychology students at universities based on the subject-activity approach.


  • Anusic I, Schimmack U (2016) Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5): 766-781.
  • Baibarin AA, Mashkin NA, Shelengovskiy PG (2016) The northwest Caucasus from ancient times to the 19th century: A historiographical review of the recent publications in the periodicals. Rusin, 46(4): 119-140.
  • Boldyreva IN (2015) Reflection in the context of management paradigm and social reality. Moscow: International Academy of Evaluation and Consulting.
  • Chella A, Frixione M, Gaglio S (2008) A cognitive architecture for robot self-consciousness. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 44(2): 147-154.
  • Chigisheva O, Soltovets E, Bondarenko A (2017). Functional foreign language literacy for global research career development: Analysis of standardized open-ended interview responses. XLinguae, 10(4): 138-153.
  • Cornilov GA, Ilkevich KB, Shalomova EV, Kartushina IG, Musharatsky ML, Mashkin NA, Altukhov SA (2019) Features of alcohol consumption motives and practices by full-time and part-time training students. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 7(3): 438-444.
  • de Vries R, Heering HD, Postmes L, Goedhart S, Sno HN, de Haan L (2013) Self-Disturbance in Schizophrenia: A Phenomenological Approach to Better Understand Our Patients. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord, 15(1).
  • Else-Quest NM, Higgins A, Allison C, Morton LC (2012) Gender differences in self-conscious emotional experience: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5): 947-981.
  • Eysenck H (1998) Intelligence: A New Look. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Galushkin AA (2015) Internet in Modern Russia: History of Development, Place and Role. Asian Social Science, 11(18): 305-310.
  • Gorbunov MA, Fadeeva AV, Shirshikov VB, Matveev PA, Popova OV, Mitrofanova MYu, Bakaeva JYu, Mashkin NA (2019) Nature protection potential of wildlife sanctuary: Protection and Preservation of its Ecological Biodiversity. Ekoloji, 107: 5033-5037, Article No: e107576.
  • Grant A, Franklin J, Langford P (2002) The Self-Reflection and Insight Scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality, 30(8): 821-836.
  • Heilinger J-C, Crone K (2014) Human freedom and enhancement. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 17(1): 13-21.
  • Kanthan R, Senger J-LB (2011) An appraisal of students’ awareness of «self-reflection» in a first-year pathology course of undergraduate medical/dental education. BMC Medical Education, 11: 67-72.
  • Karpov AV (2004) Psychology of reflexive activity mechanisms. Moscow: Institute of Psychology under RAS.
  • Kayasheva OI (2015). Development of personal reflection in clients during psychological counseling and psycho-correction. Saint Petersburg: Scientific Research Center ART.
  • Kayasheva OI (2016) Phenomenon of personal reflection and exercise of free choice by the subject in difficult life situations URAO Bulletin, 1: 74-77.
  • Kayasheva OI, Khanova ZG (2018) Reflexivity as a factor of professional success of future experts in the context of subject-activity approach (on the case study of psychology students). Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 4(129): 171-175.
  • Kholodnaya MA (2004) Cognitive styles. About the nature of individual mind. Saint Petersburg: Piter.
  • Kinsella EA, Phelan SK, Lala AP, Mom V (2015) An investigation of students’ perceptions of ethical practice: engaging a reflective dialogue about ethics education in the health professions. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(3): 781-801.
  • Leander NP, vanDellen MR, Rachl-Willberger J, Shah JY, Fitzsimons GJ, Chartrand TL (2016) Is Freedom Contagious? A Self-Regulatory Model of Reactance and Sensitivity to Deviant Peers. Motivation Science, 2(4): 256-267.
  • Lefevr V (2003) Reflection. Moscow: Cogito-Centre.
  • Lepsky VE (2010) Reflective-active environment of innovative development. Moscow: Cogito-Centre.
  • Mamardashvili MK (1996) Need in own self: introduction to philosophy. Moscow: Labyrinth, 267-279.
  • Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A. (2009) Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systemic review. Adv in Health Sci Edu, 14: 595-621.
  • Novikov DA, Chkhartyshvili AG (2003) Reflexive games. Moscow: SINTEG.
  • Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA (2016) Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition? Behavior Research Methods, 48(1): 341-348.
  • Piaget J (1951) The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Quinton S, Smallbone T (2010) Feeding forward: using feedback to promote student reflection and learning - a teaching model Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1): 125-135.
  • Rogers RR (2001) Reflection in higher education: a concept analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 26(1): 37-57.
  • Rossohin AV (2010) Reflection and internal dialogue in the altered states of consciousness: Interconsciousness in psychoanalysis. Moscow: Cogito-Centre.
  • Rubinstein SL (2003) Being and Consciousness. Human and World. Saint Petersburg: Piter.
  • Sawa K, Igamberdiev AU (2016) The Double Homunculus model of self-reflective systems. Bio Systems, 144: 1-7.
  • Shadrikov VD (2013) The role of reflection and reflexivity in the development of students’ abilities. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 6(2): 55-64.
  • Smith D, Hatton N (1993) Reflection in Teacher Education: A Study in Progress. Education Research and Perspectives, 20(1): 13-23.
  • Sternberg RJ, Mio J (2009) Cognitive psychology. Australia, Belmont: Cengage Learning Wadsworth.
  • Strielkowski W, Chigisheva O (2018) Research functionality and academic publishing: Gaming with altmetrics in the digital age. Economics and Sociology, 11(4): 306-316.
  • Urbaniok F, Laubacher A, Hardegger J, Rossegger A, Endrass J, Moskvitin K (2012) Neurobiological Determinism: Human Freedom of Choice and Criminal Responsibility. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(2): 174-190.
  • Vess M, Schlegel RJ, Hicks JA, Arndt J (2014) Guilty, but not ashamed: «true» self-conceptions influence affective responses to personal shortcomings. Journal of Personality, 82(3): 213-224.


This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.