The evaluation of chip freeze-dried cancellous bone allograft of local products usage as a scaffold in completing small defects on long bone


Background: Bone graft as a therapeutic modality for bone defects reconstruction has been widely applied. Bone autograft is the optimum comparative standard for each substitute material, but can still cause complications and limited availability. Bone allograft has long been used as a natural substitute material for bone autograft. Chip freeze-dried bone allograft is one of the allograft’s types available in various shapes and sizes, so it has the capability of filling the gaps of bone defects precisely. Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the achievement of chip freeze-dried bone allograft in completing small bone defects compared to bone autograft. Method: The researchers recapitulated the data of 10 patients with bone autograft, and chip freeze-dried bone allograft and evaluated the outcome of applying bone repair by utilizing Hammer classification on bone defects healing. The collected data were then examined statistically with the Mann-Whitney Test. Results: In the autograft group, 70% of radiological evaluations were mostly obtained from grade 2 Hammer classifications. While, in the allograft group, the highest results were obtained in grade 3 Hammer classifications, those were 40%. Statistical tests indicated that there was no significant difference in bone healing between the bone autograft and the bone allograft groups (p=0.579). Conclusion: Bone, in both groups (bone autograft and chip freeze-dried cancellous bone allograft), has the same results in terms of the healing process.


  • Borjian, A., Nazem, K. A., & Yassine, H. (2006). Complications of massive allograft reconstruction for bone tumors.
  • Buckwalter, J., Einhorn, T., Simon, S (2000). Orthopaedic Basic Science. III. American Academy of Orthopaedics Surgeons;.
  • Bullens, P. H. J. (2011). Reconstruction of segmental long bone defects. [Sl: sn].
  • Canale, S. T., & Beaty, J. H. (2008). Campbell’s operative orthopaedics 11th ed. Pensylvania (USA): Mosby & Elsevier, 2421.
  • Delloye, C., Cornu, O., Druez, V., & Barbier, O. (2007). Bone allografts: what they can offer and what they cannot. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 89(5), 574-580.
  • Dion, R., Sim, F. (2002).The Use of Allograft in Orthopaedic Surgery. JBJS. 84:44–54.
  • Flierl, M. A., Smith, W. R., Mauffrey, C., Irgit, K., Williams, A. E., Ross, E.,... & Stahel, P. F. (2013). Outcomes and complication rates of different bone grafting modalities in long bone fracture nonunions: a retrospective cohort study in 182 patients. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 8(1), 33.
  • Greenwald, A. S., Boden, S. D., Goldberg, V. M., Khan, Y., Laurencin, C. T., & Rosier, R. N. (2001). Bone-graft substitutes: facts, fictions, and applications. JBJS, 83(2_suppl_2), S98-103.
  • Lavernia, C. J., Malinin, T. I., Temple, H. T., & Moreyra, C. E. (2004). Bone and tissue allograft use by orthopaedic surgeons. The Journal of arthroplasty, 19(4), 430-435.
  • Matejovsky, J., Matejovsky, Z., Konfranek, I (2006)., Massive Allograft in Tumour Surgery. Int Orthop. 30.
  • Miller, M. (2008).Review of Orthopaedic. V. Saunders Elsevier;
  • Nather, A., Yusof, N., & Hilmy, N. (2010). Allograft procurement, processing and transplantation: A comprehensive guide for tissue banks. World Scientific.
  • Nayagam, S., Warwick, D., & Solomon, L. (2010). Apley’s system of orthopaedics and fractures. Hodder Arnold.
  • Rajan, G. P., Fornaro, J., Trentz, O., & Zellweger, R. (2006). Cancellous allograft versus autologous bone grafting for repair of comminuted distal radius fractures: a prospective, randomized trial. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 60(6), 1322-1329.
  • Singh, A. K., & Issac, J. (2018). Impact of Climatic and Non-climatic Factors on Sustainable Livelihood Security in Gujarat State of India: A Statistical Exploration. Agriculture and Food Sciences Research, 5(1), 30-46
  • Utomo, D. N., Hernugrahanto, K. D., Edward, M., Widhiyanto, L., & Mahyudin, F. (2019). Combination of bone marrow aspirate, cancellous bone allograft, and platelet-rich plasma as an alternative solution to critical-sized diaphyseal bone defect: A case series. International journal of surgery case reports, 58, 178-185.
  • Widiyanti, P. (2016). Composition variation on bone graft synthesis based on hydroxyapatite and alginate. In Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (Vol. 29, pp. 14-21). Trans Tech Publications Ltd


This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.