The conception of sustainable development in the light of converging technologies
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 2019 - Volume 13 Issue 2, pp. 2159-2165
  • Published Online: 14 Dec 2019
  • Article Views: 233 | Article Download: 206
  • Open Access Full Text (PDF)
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Mantatov V, Mantatova L, Nasibulina A, Tutubalin V. The conception of sustainable development in the light of converging technologies. Eurasia J Biosci. 2019;13(2), 2159-2165.

APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Mantatov et al., 2019)
Reference: Mantatov, V., Mantatova, L., Nasibulina, A., & Tutubalin, V. (2019). The conception of sustainable development in the light of converging technologies. Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 13(2), 2159-2165.

Chicago
In-text citation: (Mantatov et al., 2019)
Reference: Mantatov, Vyacheslav, Larisa Mantatova, Anastasia Nasibulina, and Vitaly Tutubalin. "The conception of sustainable development in the light of converging technologies". Eurasian Journal of Biosciences 2019 13 no. 2 (2019): 2159-2165.

Harvard
In-text citation: (Mantatov et al., 2019)
Reference: Mantatov, V., Mantatova, L., Nasibulina, A., and Tutubalin, V. (2019). The conception of sustainable development in the light of converging technologies. Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 13(2), pp. 2159-2165.

MLA
In-text citation: (Mantatov et al., 2019)
Reference: Mantatov, Vyacheslav et al. "The conception of sustainable development in the light of converging technologies". Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019, pp. 2159-2165.

Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Mantatov V, Mantatova L, Nasibulina A, Tutubalin V. The conception of sustainable development in the light of converging technologies. Eurasia J Biosci. 2019;13(2):2159-65.

Abstract

In the age of converging technologies, the problem of harmonizing permanent technological progress and sustainable human development is actualized. On the one hand, it is necessary to bring the high strategic status of converging technologies in line with high axiological priorities for sustainable development; on the other hand, the conception of sustainable development should be updated taking into account the new realities of modern technological development. The Russian scientific literature is dominated by the understanding of sustainable development as a safe type of socio-natural interaction aimed at the survival of mankind and the preservation of nature, their coexistence and co-evolution. At the same time, we must recognize that the ecological interpretation of sustainable development is very important and indeed a priority, but it is still only the initial stage of understanding the spiritual and humanistic meaning of sustainable development as a cosmic phenomenon. In particular, in the structure of the conception of sustainable development, the problem of the elevation of spiritual humanism in its connection with a new stage of technological dynamism is now filled with a special meaning. We consider the spiritual and humanistic project of sustainable technological development as an alternative to the idea of a posthuman future and as an antipode to the technocratic paradigm in general.

References

  • “Science. Technology. Person” (2015) Materials of the round table. Philosophy of science and technology, 20(2): 5-50.
  • Arshinov VI, Budanov VG (2016) The paradigm of complexity and socio-humanitarian projections of converging technologies. Questions of philosophy, 1: 59-70.
  • Baibarin AA, Mashkin NA, Shelengovskiy PG (2016) The northwest Caucasus from ancient times to the 19th century: A historiographical review of the recent publications in the periodicals. Rusin, 46(4): 119-140. https://doi.org/10.17223/18572685/46/8
  • Belkina GL (2012) Man and his future: New technologies and human capabilities. Moscow: Lenand.
  • Bostrom N (2014) Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bransky VP, Pozharsky SD, Mikaylova IG, Busov SV, Zobova MR (2017) The global development of mankind from the standpoint of a synergetic philosophy of history. Questions of philosophy, 5: 55-65.
  • Deleuze G, Guattari F (2009) What is philosophy? Moscow: Academic Prospect Publ.
  • Dergacheva EA (2016) Concept of sociotechnonatural globalization: interdisciplinary analysis. Moscow: Lenand.
  • Dormehl, L. 2014. The formula: how algorithms solve all our problems and create more. London: Virgin Books.
  • Dubrovsky DI (2013) Global Future 2045. Convergent technologies (NBICS) and transhumanist evolution. Moscow: MBA.
  • Evteev SA, Perelet RA (1989) Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). Moscow: Progress.
  • Fukuyama F (2004). Our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Moscow: AST Publishing House.
  • Galushkin AA (2015) Education in the field of national information security in the Russian federation and abroad. Journal of Computer Science, 11(10): 988-994. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2015.988.994
  • Gnatik EN (2012) Transhumanist projects in the convergent technology epoch. In: G.L. Belkina (Ed.). Man and his future: New technologies and human capabilities. Moscow: Lenand.
  • Guespin-Michel J (2016) La révolution du complexe. Retrieved from http://www.revolutionducomplexe.fr/images/downloads/revolutionducomplexeguespin.pdf
  • Habermas J (2002) The future of human nature. Moscow: Ves’ mir.
  • Harari YN (2018) Homo Deus. A brief history of tomorrow. Moscow: Sindbad Publishers Ltd. https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406704024
  • Hegel GWF (1971) Works of different years. Moscow: Thought.
  • Hidalgo C (2015) Why information grows: The evolution of order, from atoms to economies. New York: Basic Books.
  • Joachim K, Plévert L (2009) Nanosciences: The invisible revolution. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812837158
  • Kelly K (2010) What technology wants. New York: Viking Press.
  • Kelly K (2011) Protopia. Retrieved from https://kk.org/thetechnium/protopia/
  • Kelly K (2017) The inevitable: Understanding the 12 technological forces that will shape our future. Moscow: MIF.
  • Krüger O (2004) Virtualität und Unsterblichkeit: Die Visionen des Posthumanismus. Freiburg: Rombach.
  • Kurzweil K, Grossman T (2004) Fantastic voyage: live long enough to live forever. Emmaus: Rodale.
  • Kurzweil R (2015) How to create a mind: The secret of human thought revealed. Moscow: “E” Publ.
  • Kutyryov VA (2010) The philosophy of transhumanism. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod University.
  • Latour B (2006) Where are the missing masses? Sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: V. Vakhshtein (Ed.). Sociology of things. Moscow: Territory of future, 199-222.
  • Liseev IK (2018) Philosophy of socio-natural interaction in the age of convergent technologies. St. Petersburg: Nestor-History.
  • Mantatov VV, Tutubalin VA (2018) Sustainable development, technological singularity and ethics. European Research Studies Journal, 21(4): 714-725.
  • Marx K, Engels F (1983) Werke. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
  • Nazaretyan AP (2015) Nonlinear future: megahistory, synergetics, cultural anthropology and psychology in global forecasting, 3th edition. Moscow: Argamak-Media.
  • Orlov VV (1999). The history of human intellect. Perm: Perm State University.
  • Pride V, Korotaev AV (2008) New technologies and the continuation of human evolution? The transhumanist project of the future. Moscow: LKI Publ.
  • Rockström J (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2): 1-33. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232
  • Roco MC, Bainbridge WS, Tonn B, Whitesides G (2013) Convergence of Knowledge, Technology and Society. Beyond Convergence of Nano-Bio-Info-Cognitive Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02204-8
  • Stepin VS (2007) On the philosophical foundations of synergetics. In: V.G. Budanov (Ed.). Synergetic paradigm: synergetics of education. Moscow: Progress-Tradititsiya, 97-102.
  • Tu W (2019) Spiritual humanism: personality, society, Earth and Heaven. Age of globalization, 2(30): 16-37.
  • Turchin VF (2000) The phenomenon of science. A cybernetic approach to evolution, 2nd edition. Moscow: ETS Publ.
  • Valishin FT (2018) The problem of the beginning and the strategy of dynamism. Moscow: Entsiklopedist-Maksimum.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.