An innovative and practical activity in all spheres of human life has become a characteristic feature of the modern era. Such activities directly depend on the project competence formation in the professional education system. Project technologies are one of the most promising educational technologies. They have significant potential for the development of personal qualities and the formation of students’ professional competencies of any specialty. This is evidenced by the modern research results. For students (learners)’ future activities as a teacher, it is important to develop the “project activities readiness” competence. Accordingly, the main goal of our research was to identify the readiness of undergraduate biology students to organize and execute projects, as well as to identify the willingness of teachers to apply the project-based training technology in the educational process. It should be underlined that this study analyzed only open questions to identify teachers’ ideas and future biology teachers’ ideas about the project-based training technology, identify needs related to this technology and provide a basis for further research. The authors of the article surveyed 115 students of specialty “5В011300 - Biology” and 75 teachers at Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University and Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University. The questionnaire method was used in the form of open-ended questions. The data was analyzed using content analysis. Based on the survey results, an urgent problem was identified: the unreadiness of both teachers and students for projects organization and implementation. Bringing teachers and students to the formation and implementation of students’ readiness for projects organization in the biological disciplines teaching process requires the development of a scientifically based methodology for the development of this competence in the future.


  • Andreeva N, Solomin V, Vasilyeva T (2009) Theory and methods of teaching ecology: a textbook for students of higher education institutions. “Academy” Publishing Center.
  • Bahisheva S (2011) Pedagogical projecting: Theory and Technology. Almaty: Association of Higher Education Institutions of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
  • Baki A, Butuner SO (2009) Kırsal kesimdeki bir ilköğretim okulunda proje yürütme sürecinden yansımalar [Reflections on the project implementation process in a primary school in rural area]. İlköğretim Online, 8(1): 146-158. Retrieved from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/ilkonline/article/view/5000038193/5000037050
  • Baysura OD, Altun S, Yucel-Toy B (2015) Perceptions of teacher candidates regarding project-based learning. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 62: 15-36. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.62.3
  • Bell S (2010) Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83: 39-43. Retrieved from http://teacherscollegesj.edu/docs/47-pblforthe21century_1226201292135.pdf
  • Brinia V (2011) Project: a trainee oriented training method, an empirical approach. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 1(2): 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1108/20423891111128926
  • Dag F, Durdu L (2012) Öğretmen Adaylarının proje tabanlı öğrenme sürecine yönelik görüşleri [Opinions of prospective teachers about project based learning process]. E-Journal of New World Science Academy, 7(1): 200-211. Retrieved from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/nwsaedu/article/view/5000063134/5000059283
  • Dewey J (2000) Democracy and Education. Translated from English. Pedagogy press.
  • Dreher R (2013) Implementing the principles of project based education in Bachelor courses. Higher Education in Russia, 2: 46-49.
  • Fain N, Wagner B, Vukašinović N (2016) A project-based approach to learning: comparative study of two disciplines. Design and technology education: an international journal, 21: 51-60.
  • Gammariello D, Incoronato AL, Conte A, Del Nobile MA (2016) Effect of sodium alginate coating with ascorbic acid on shelf life of raw pork meat. Journal of Food Technology Research, 3(1): 1-11.
  • Han S, Rosli R, Capraro MM, Capraro RR (2016) The Effect of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Project Based Learning (PBL) on Students’ Achievement in Four Mathematics Topics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(Special Issue): 3-29.
  • Irsaliev S, Kultumanova A, Sabyruly E (2017) The main results of the international study PISA-2015. National Report. Astana: Informational-Analytical Center JSC.
  • Kilpatrick W (1925) Project Method. The use of the target installation in the pedagogical process. LSU.
  • Korkmaz H, Kaptan F (2001) Fen eğitiminde proje tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımı [Project-based learning approach in science education]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20: 193-200.
  • Krajcik JS, Blumenfeld P (2006) Project-based learning. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge.
  • Kralla N (2005) Project method as a means of enhancing students’ learning. Omsk: publication of the Omsk State University.
  • Kаrpudewan M, Ponniah J, Zain AN (2016) Project-based learning: An approach to promote energy literacy among secondary school students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(2): 229-237.
  • Lazarev T (2011) Project method: errors in use. Received from http://ps.1september.ru/article.php
  • Lazarev V (2014) Recommendations for teachers on the development of practical and cognitive skills of students in project activities. Surgut: RIO SuGPU.
  • Matyash N (2014) Innovative educational technology. Project training. “Academy” Publishing Center.
  • Nesgovorova N (2013) Technology of projects in the professional activities of a teacher. Kurgan: Publishing House of KSU.
  • Novo M, Murga-Menoyo M-Á, Bautista-Cerro M-J (2010) Educational advances and trends for sustainable development: A research project on educational innovation. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(4): 302-314.
  • Nuriev M, Seisenbaeva Zh, Sovetkanova D (2019) Project based teaching technology in the educational process. Almaty: KazNPU named after Abai, “Ulagat” Publishing house.
  • Ozkan HH, Albayrak M, Berber K (2005) Öğretmen adaylarının ilköğretim okullarında yaptıkları öğretmenlik uygulamasının yetişmelerindeki rolü [Role of teacher candidates teaching practices in elementary schools in their training]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 33: 168.
  • Patton MQ (1999) Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5): 1189-1208.
  • Pentin A (2007) Research and project activities: structure and objectives. School technology, 5, p. 111.
  • Ruangrit N (2009) Collaborative project-based learning and blended learning according to the principle of edutainment of participants in the APEC edutainment exchange program. Retrieved from http://ejournals.swu.ac.th/index.php/ictl/article/view/384
  • Sharipov F (2012) Technology of project training. Pedagogical Journal of Bashkortostan. 2 (39): 87-93.
  • Trishchenko D (2018) Experience in project-based learning: an attempt to objectively analyze achievements and problems. The Education and Science Journal, 20(4): 132-152.
  • Zeren Ozer D, Ozkan M (2012) Proje tabanlı öğretimin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bilimsel süreç becerileri üzerine etkisi [Effects of project-based instruction on scientific process skills of preservice science teachers]. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(3): 119-130.


This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.