AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Sirajuddin SN, Hastang, Sri Lestari V, Rosmawaty. Livestock ecology research on institution and traditional sharing systems in cattle farms. Eurasia J Biosci. 2019;13(1), 239-244.

APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Sirajuddin et al., 2019)
Reference: Sirajuddin, S. N., Hastang, Sri Lestari, V., & Rosmawaty (2019). Livestock ecology research on institution and traditional sharing systems in cattle farms. Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 13(1), 239-244.

Chicago
In-text citation: (Sirajuddin et al., 2019)
Reference: Sirajuddin, Sitti Nurani, Hastang, Veronica Sri Lestari, and Rosmawaty. "Livestock ecology research on institution and traditional sharing systems in cattle farms". Eurasian Journal of Biosciences 2019 13 no. 1 (2019): 239-244.

Harvard
In-text citation: (Sirajuddin et al., 2019)
Reference: Sirajuddin, S. N., Hastang, Sri Lestari, V., and Rosmawaty (2019). Livestock ecology research on institution and traditional sharing systems in cattle farms. Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 13(1), pp. 239-244.

MLA
In-text citation: (Sirajuddin et al., 2019)
Reference: Sirajuddin, Sitti Nurani et al. "Livestock ecology research on institution and traditional sharing systems in cattle farms". Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, vol. 13, no. 1, 2019, pp. 239-244.

Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Sirajuddin SN, Hastang, Sri Lestari V, Rosmawaty. Livestock ecology research on institution and traditional sharing systems in cattle farms. Eurasia J Biosci. 2019;13(1):239-44.

Abstract

The present research aimed to analysis differences between the traditional profit share system and institution profit share system in cattle farms. The research was conducted from February to March 2018 in the Maiwa Sub-district, Enrekang District by using quantitative and descriptive methods. The types of data were qualitative and quantitative from both primary and secondary sources, and the data analysis used was the frequency distribution and income analysis. The results show that characteristics of the respondents in the traditional system and the institution system are similar regarding age and livestock experience, but show differences in educational attainment, a number of family members, and the commercial scale. Beef cattle farmers who follow the system of partnerships with the institution profit share system are mainly at secondary level (45.4%), while beef cattle farmers who follow a traditional profit share system are also mainly at the secondary level (46.8%). Farmers who followed the institution system had higher incomes compared to those in the traditional system of revenue sharing of pastoralists. The traditional sharing system does not involve a contract while the institution sharing system uses a contract. The institution sharing system, therefore, provided more significant benefit to farmers.

References

  • Ahmad SN, Siswansyah DD, Swastika DKS (2004) Kajian sistem usaha ternak sapi potong di Kalimantan tengah. Jurnal Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian, 7: 155-70 (Id).
  • Andrian (2017) Analisis pendapatan peternak dengan system bagi hasil dan Maiwa Breeding Centre dan Teseng di Kecamatan Maiwa. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Hasanuddin University, South Sulawesi, Indonesia (Id).
  • Badriyah N, Setiawan R (2012) Hubungan pengetahuan peternak sapi potong terhadap keberhasilan IB di Kecamatan Sarirejo Kabupaten Lamongan. Jurnal Ternak, 3: 10-8 (Id).
  • Demir S, İbiloğlu AO, Kaya MC, Güneş M (2015) Mania associated with paliperidone treatment in schizophrenia: A case report. J Clin Exp Invest., 6(3): 321-3. https://doi.org/10.5799/ahinjs.01.2015.03.0543
  • Dogan S, et al. (2016) The Role of Ultrasonography for Differentiating and Management of Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes. European Journal of General Medicine, 13(1): 7-15. https://doi.org/10.15197/ejgm.01416
  • Eaton C, Sheperd AW (2001) Contract Farming: Partnership for Growth. Rome, Italy: FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin, 145.
  • Firmansyah C, Kuswaryan S, Rahayu S (2006) Financial benefit on local cattle breeding smallholder sharing pattern. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak, 6: 75-80 (Id).
  • Hartono B, Rohaeni ES (2014) Contribution to income of traditional beef cattle farmers’ households in Tanah Laut Regency, South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 26.
  • Haryadi FT (2004) Hubungan motivasi beternak sapi potong dengan pendapatan peternak. Jurnal Pengembangan Penyuluhan Pertanian, 1: 10-16 (Id).
  • Hasnudi, Berutu IS, Daulay AH, Ginting N, Sembiring I (2018) Analysis of cattle breeder’s income in South Kualuh sub-district of Labuan Batu Utara Regency. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, paper 122: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/122/1/012119
  • Hikmat H (2001) Strategi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Bandung: Humaniora Utama (Id).
  • Jenaabadi H, Khosropour A (2014) An Investigation on the amount of employing totl quality management principles by school principals and its’ correspondence with their affectivity: 13-7.
  • Jermias JA, Tulle DR, Leo-Penu CLO, Jelantik IGN (2017) Tingkat pendapatan peternak pada penggemukan sapi Bali dengan sistem bagi hasil di Kabupaten Kupang. Partner, 17: 43-50 (Id).
  • Kariyasa K (2005) Sistem integrasi tanaman-ternak dalam perspektif reorientasi kebijakan subsidi pupuk dan peningkatan pendapatan petani. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 3: 68-80 (Id).
  • Koçarslan S, et al. (2014) The prevalence of incidental neuroendocrine tumours in the appendectomy materials&58; Ten-year’s archive search. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations, 5(4): 563-6. https://doi.org/10.5799/ahinjs.01.2014.04.0458
  • Kusnadi U (2008) Inovasi teknologi peternakan dalam sub sistem integrasi tanaman- ternak untuk menunjang swasembada daging sapi. Pengembangan Inovasi Pertanian, 1: 189-205 (Id).
  • Mahmud A (2013) Analisis daya saing dan strategi pengembangan peternakan sapi potong di propinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Unpublished Magister Thesis, Agricultural Institute of Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia (Id).
  • Majid RB, Hassan S (2014) Performance at broiler contract farmers: a case study in Perak, Malaysia. UMK Procedia, 1: 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.umkpro.2014.07.003
  • Mappigau P, Hastang, Asnawi A, Kadir S (2015) Collaboration problems among cattle farmers and traders in Bali cattle supply chain: how to improve cattle farmers income. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 23: 231-8.
  • Mardani M, Lavasani SM, Omidvari M (2014) An investigation into DOW and MOND indices with fuzzy logic based on fire and explosion risk assessment in Iran oil refinery. UCT Journal of Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2(3): 126-37.
  • Muhzi M (1984) Pengaruh pola penggaduhan ternak sapi potong terhadap distribusi pendapatan di Kabupaten Lombok Barat, Nusa Tenggara Barat. Unpublished Magister Thesis, Agricultural Institute of Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia (Id).
  • Murti AT, Astuti FK (2017) Analisis pendapatan usaha sapi potong dengan usaha tani persawahan padi di Kabupaten Situbondo. Buana Sains, 1: 103-10 (Id).
  • Murwanto AG (2008) Karakteristik peternak dan tingkat masukan teknologi peternakan sapi potong di lembah prafi kabupaten manokwari. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan, 3: 8-15 (Id).
  • Nono OH (2011) Dampak kelembagaan bagi hasil terhadap kinerja usaha penggemukan sapi potong di Kabupaten Kupang. Sosiohumaniora, 13: 28-38 (Id). https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v13i1.5460
  • Pica-Ciamarra U, Tasciotti L, Otte J, Zezza A (2011) Livestock Assets, Livestock Income and Rural Households: Cross-Country Evidence from Household Surveys. Rome: FAO.
  • Rahmah UIL (2014) Hubungan antara karakteristik dengan respon peternak terhadap introduksi teknologi Inseminasi Buatan (IB) pada ternak domba. Jurnal Ilmu dan Peternakan, 2: 1-12 (Id).
  • Riduwan MBA (2002) Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung, Indonesia: Penerbit Alfabeta (Id).
  • Sanjaya S, Sudarwati L (2015) Modal sosial sistem bagi hasil dalam beternak sapi pada masyarakat desa purwosari atas, kecamatan dolok batu nanggar kabupaten Simalungun. Perspektif Sosiologi, 3: 18-330 (Id).
  • Sirajuddin SN, Aminawar M, Nurlaelah S, Amrawaty A (2016) Income analysis of beef cattle breeders for traditional profit-sharing system, Tesang, in South Sulawesi Province. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 10.
  • Strohm K, Hoeffler H (2006) Contract farming in Kenya: theory, evidence from selected value chains, and implications for development cooperation. Kenya: Promotion of Private Sector Development in Agriculture.
  • Sukanata IW, Suparta N, Parimartha IW, Budiartha, Suciani (2013) Strategy to increase marketing efficiency in beef cattle farmers group “Mekar Jaya” in the village of Puhu-Payangan. Udayana Serving, 12: 5-9 (Id).
  • Sundari ASR, Triatmaja H (2009) Analisis pendapatan peternak sapi potong sistem pemeliharaan intensif dan konvensional di Kabupaten Sleman Yogyakarta. Sains Peternakan, 7: 73-9 (Id). https://doi.org/10.20961/sainspet.7.2.73-79
  • Tripathi RS, Singh R, Singh S (2005) Contract farming in potato production: an alternative for managing risk and uncertainty. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 18: 47-60.
  • Trisbudi YA, Ristyawan (2017) Analisis ekonomi sapi potong pola gaduhan: studi kasus di desa Sorok, Kecamatan Kromengan, Kabupaten Malang. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 6: 27-42 (Id). https://doi.org/10.26418/jebik.v6i1.20724
  • Wang HH, Wang Y, Delgado MS (2014) The transition to modern agriculture: contract farming in developing economies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96: 1257-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau036
  • Widarto (2014) Perjanjian Kawukan (bagi hasil) ternak menurut hukum Adat Besemah di Kecamatan Kemuning Kabupaten Kaur. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia (Id).

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.