Abstract

Modern society is becoming not just post-industrial, but also informational. Progressive trends that change the very nature of consumption are manifested in changes in goods and services consumed on the Internet, including educational services. The purpose of the research is to study the features of consumption of fostering and educational services in modern Russian society. Research methods: as a research method, we used the questionnaire method, which allows us to identify most effectively the specifics of using the Internet space for the consumption of fostering and educational services for the development of creative abilities of the individual. Research results: the article discusses the practice of consumption of fostering and educational services on the Internet by modern families. The novelty and originality of the research lies in the fact that for the first time the Internet was studied as a space for educational and fostering practices. It is shown that modern parents consider the Internet space as the most creative space of modern civilization. The relationship between family wellbeing and consumption of fostering and educational creative practices on the Internet is traced. It is revealed that low and average material security of a family has a certain direct relationship with a high degree of involvement of these family members in joint project fostering practices. It is revealed that modern parents, thanks to their desires and opportunities, receive the necessary information on the upbringing and education of their children on the Internet. For the first time, it was revealed that the main consumed practices taken from the Internet related to upbringing and education are: everyday labor practices involving all family members; making joint parental decisions; joint family games; joint creative decision-making in the process of project productive activities. Practical significance: the data Obtained in this work can be used in family psychology, educational psychology, valeology, management, as well as for further theoretical development of this issue.

References

  • Arrow KJ (2004) Collective choice and individual values. Moscow: publishing house of the higher school of Economics.
  • Atkin D (2005) Cult of brands: how to make a buyer like-minded. Moscow: AST.
  • Baranov VV, Cherdymova EI, Novikov SB, Lukina EV, Kazurov OA, Korzhanova AA, Gurbanov RA (2019) Student attitude to ethical consumption as new ecological practice. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4): 1173-1179.
  • Bard A, Zoderkvist Ya (2004) Technocracy. The new ruling elite and life after capitalism. St. Petersburg: Stockholm school of Economics in Saint Petersburg.
  • Baudrillard J (2006) Consumer society. Its myths and structures. Moscow: Cultural Revolution: Republic.
  • Bayanova AR, Sivova IV, Kamasheva YL, Popova OV, Semyanov EV, Shagieva RV, Yusupov IM (2020) Student online services consumption: Routine practices or mistrust to digital service? Contemporary Educational Technology, 11(1): 47-54.
  • Bayanova AR, Sizova ZM, Chistyakov AA, Prokopyev AI, Vasbieva DG (2019). A philosophical view of organizational culture policy in contemporary universities. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(3): 121-131.
  • Belyavsky IK (2005) Regional analysis of the consumer market (experience and methods of statistical research). Statistics issues, 9: 16-25.
  • Blackwell R, Miniard P, Angel J (2007) Consumer behavior. St. Petersburg: Piter.
  • Castels M (2000) Information age: economy, society and culture, Moscow: HSE.
  • Cherdymova EI (2011) Psychological basis of integration of environmental and professional consciousness in the process of learning at the University. Science and business: ways of development, 4: 42-44.
  • Cherdymova EI, Lipen SV, Kornev AV, Ovchinnikova LI, Ovchinnikov AA, Stolyarova AN, Tyutyunnik IG, Vilskaya NV (2019) Explanation of donation: advantages and downsides. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 8(2): 475-481.
  • Florida R (2005) Creative class: people who change the future. Moscow: publishing house “Classic-XX1”.
  • Galperin VM (1993) Theory of consumer behavior and demand. St.Petersburg: Economic school.
  • Gurova T, Medovnikov D, Novikov A (2000) News of national consumption. Expert, 5: 17-22.
  • Ilyin VI (2000) Consumer behavior. St.Petersburg: Peter.
  • Inglehart R (1997) Postmodern: changing values and changing societies. Political research, 4: 632-642.
  • Jamieson F (2002) Postmodernism and consumer society. Logos, 3(34): 7-10.
  • Kaletina LA, Ibraeva GR, Martynenko EV, Sukhodolova EP, Grinev VA, Magomedova AA, Zhdanov SP (2020) Access to information resource: problem of openness and privacy in internet space. Eurasia Journal of Bioscience, 14: 4305-4309.
  • Kovaleva AI, Lukov VA (1999) Sociology of youth: Theoretical questions, Moscow: Socium.
  • Kravchenko SA (2004) Sociology: paradigms through the prism of sociological imagination. Moscow: Exam publishing house.
  • Kvon GM, Prokopyev AI, Shestak VA, Larionova AA, Shikh EV (2019) Features of cost advantages from implementation of energy-saving projects. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(3): 53–58.
  • Lyubimtseva S (2002) Consumer demand and supply in the domestic market. Economist, 5: 33-50.
  • Makarova TN, Lygina NL (2005) Consumer behavior. Moscow: Infra-M.
  • Polyakov IV (1999) Economic behavior of a person. Saratov: Privolzh. Pub. House.
  • Pronina IN (2011) Consumption practices: the production of difference or the game with differences. Regionology, 2: 271-272.
  • Pushkarev VV, Cherdymova EI, Prokopyev AI, Kochurov MG., Shamanin NV, Ezhov SG, Kamenskaya SV, Kargina NV (2019) Motivation and needs in the area of the spouses with different experiences of cohabitation. Contemporary Dilemmas: Education, Politics and Values, 6(3): 41-53.
  • Shibutani T (2002) Social psychology. Rostov on Don: “Phoenix”.
  • Shinkevich MV, Mashkin NA, Ishmuradova II, Kolosova VV, Popova OV (2020) Management of sustainable consumption of energy resources in the conditions of digital transformation of the industrial complex. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(5): 454-460.
  • Shugalsky SS (2012) Social practices: interpretation of the concept. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2: 276-280.
  • Sorokoumova EA, Cherdymova EI, Rezvantseva MO, Kochneva LV, Latysheva VV, Perkova EP (2019) Environmental and social practices old stuff use and disposal by students. Ekoloji, 28(107): 5065-5069.
  • Statt D (2003) The psychology of the consumer. St. Petersburg: Piter.
  • Tsybikova DG (2010) Consumer attitudes of Russians. Monitoring of public opinion, 4(98): 35-44.
  • Zdravomyslov AG (1986) Needs. Interests. Values. Moscow: Politizdat.
  • Zozulev AV (2004) Consumer behavior: Student book Moscow: Znanie.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.