Evaluation of real estate project construction quality based on entropy - VIKOR method
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 2020 - Volume 14 Issue 2, pp. 2799-2804
  • Published Online: 07 Sep 2020
  • Open Access Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Quality evaluation of the essence of architecture is to provide the residents use facilities, living quality in human life proportion between the various elements, of the closest position, and construction engineering technology and management idea, also along with the development of human, from the safe, comfortable, beautiful, sustainable to value direction of development. In order to reflect the quality of the real estate project construction, this study constructs the evaluation index system of real estate development project is to build quality, choose a certain number of samples, using the entropy weight coefficient method to establish the weight of evaluation index system and using VIKOR method respectively to different real estate project carries on the comprehensive evaluation of the quality of option is given. Finally, this study verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method through the real estate project in Shenzhen.

References

  • Abdellatif M, Al-Shamma’a A (2015) Review of sustainability in buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society, 14: 171-177.
  • Beatty SE, Smith SM (1987) External search effort: An investigation across several product categories. Journal of consumer research, 14(1): 83-95.
  • Best R, De Valence G (Eds.) (1999) Building in value: pre-design issues. Routledge.
  • Bonaiuto M, Fornara F, Bonnes M (2003) Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in urban environments: a confirmation study on the city of Rome. Landscape and urban planning, 65(1-2): 41-52.
  • Bourdeau L (1999) Sustainable development and the future of construction: a comparison of visions from various countries. Building Research & Information, 27(6): 354-366.
  • Carn NG (1988) Real estate market analysis: techniques and applications. Prentice Hall.
  • Chan CS, Xiong Y (2007) The features and forces that define, maintain, and endanger Beijing courtyard housing. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research: 42-64.
  • Ding GK (2005) Developing a multicriteria approach for the measurement of sustainable performance. Building Research & Information, 33(1): 3-16.
  • Levin H (1997, June) Systematic evaluation and assessment of building environmental performance (SEABEP). In Proc. Second International Conference on Buildings and the Environment, CSTB and CIB (Vol. 2, pp. 3-10).
  • Liou JJ, Tsai CY, Lin RH, Tzeng GH (2011) A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17(2): 57-61.
  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European journal of operational research, 156(2): 445-455.
  • Ridker RG, Henning JA (1967) The determinants of residential property values with special reference to air pollution. The review of Economics and Statistics: 246-257.
  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell system technical journal, 27(3): 379-423.
  • Tang T (2012) Sustainable Buildings: Smart, Green and People-Friendly. CEM Occasional Paper Series.
  • Tzeng GH, Huang JJ (2011) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. CRC press.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.