Decision making on monitoring and evaluation system with the analytic hierarchy process (Case study: rural producer cooperatives of Golestan Province, Iran)
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Ghazimoghadam S, Farajollah Hosseini SJ, Samari D. Decision making on monitoring and evaluation system with the analytic hierarchy process (Case study: rural producer cooperatives of Golestan Province, Iran). Eurasia J Biosci. 2019;13(2), 2111-2117.

APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Ghazimoghadam et al., 2019)
Reference: Ghazimoghadam, S., Farajollah Hosseini, S. J., & Samari, D. (2019). Decision making on monitoring and evaluation system with the analytic hierarchy process (Case study: rural producer cooperatives of Golestan Province, Iran). Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 13(2), 2111-2117.

Chicago
In-text citation: (Ghazimoghadam et al., 2019)
Reference: Ghazimoghadam, Shima, Seyed Jamal Farajollah Hosseini, and Davood Samari. "Decision making on monitoring and evaluation system with the analytic hierarchy process (Case study: rural producer cooperatives of Golestan Province, Iran)". Eurasian Journal of Biosciences 2019 13 no. 2 (2019): 2111-2117.

Harvard
In-text citation: (Ghazimoghadam et al., 2019)
Reference: Ghazimoghadam, S., Farajollah Hosseini, S. J., and Samari, D. (2019). Decision making on monitoring and evaluation system with the analytic hierarchy process (Case study: rural producer cooperatives of Golestan Province, Iran). Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 13(2), pp. 2111-2117.

MLA
In-text citation: (Ghazimoghadam et al., 2019)
Reference: Ghazimoghadam, Shima et al. "Decision making on monitoring and evaluation system with the analytic hierarchy process (Case study: rural producer cooperatives of Golestan Province, Iran)". Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019, pp. 2111-2117.

Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Ghazimoghadam S, Farajollah Hosseini SJ, Samari D. Decision making on monitoring and evaluation system with the analytic hierarchy process (Case study: rural producer cooperatives of Golestan Province, Iran). Eurasia J Biosci. 2019;13(2):2111-7.

Abstract

Rural producer cooperatives are one of the most important sectors to improve agricultural productivity in rural sector. However, they are suffering from some problems caused by the lack of an efficient monitoring and evaluation system. Since each system consists of its constituents, efficiency of the constituents may guarantee performance of the whole system. Therefore, the present study was formulated in order to present a framework for decision making in monitoring and evaluation system through analytic hierarchy process (AHP). For this purpose, an author made questionnaire was given to twenty experts of Rural Cooperative Organization and rural cooperative offices in Golestan Province. Validity and reliability of the tool were confirmed by experts’ ideas and Cronbach’s α, respectively. The results showed that readiness is the most prioritized factor in rural producer cooperatives of Golestan Province followed by gathering data, purpose and scope, reporting, performance indicators, and sustaining, respectively. The sub-criteria in each criterion were also determined and presented according to their priority.

References

  • Ahmadpour A, Mokhtari V, Poursaeid AR (2013) Determination of Success in Rural Producer Cooperatives in Ilam Province. Iranian Journal of Cooperation and Agriculture, 2(8): 27-45. [In Persian].
  • Brandon PR, Smit NL, Ofir Z, Noordeloos M (2014) Monitoring and Evaluation of African Women in Agricultural Research and Development (AWARD): An Exemplar of Managing for Impact in Development Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(1): 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013509876
  • Dias A, Ioannou PG (1996) Company and project evaluation model for privately promoted infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1(71): 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:1(71)
  • Dingel M, Wei W, Huq A (2013) Cooperative learning and peer evaluation: The effect of free riders on team performance and the relationship between course performance and peer evaluation. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(1): 45-56.
  • Doheim R, Yohanis YA, Nadjai A, Elkadi H (2016) Bridging the Knowledge Gap between Fire Engineers and Building Service Engineers - Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach.Procedia Engineering, 145: 1144-1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.148
  • IFAD (2014) Managing For Impact In Rural Development, A guide for project M&E, Setting up The M&E System, section 4.
  • Janis A, Stiefel KM, Carbullido CC (2010) Evolution of a monitoring and evaluation system in disaster recovery: Learning from the Katrina Aid Today National Case Management Consortium: Enhancing disaster and emergency preparedness, response, and recovery through evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 126: 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.330
  • Kato T, Hirose Y (2010) Development and Evaluation of Cooperative Education Programs in the Developmental Stage Our New Evaluating Approach for a Challenging Higher Education.Ritsumeikan University, Institute for General Education, Career Education Center, Japan.
  • Kusek JZ, Rist R (2004) Building Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Assessing Countries Readiness. Prem Note, World Bank, 2004.
  • Li MK, Liu YK, Peng MJ, Xie CL, Yang LQ (2016) The decision making method of task arrangement based on analytic hierarchy process for nuclear safety in radiation field.Progress in Nuclear Energy, 93: 318-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.09.006
  • Lindstrom J (2009) What is the state of M&E in agriculture? Findings of the ALINe online consultation survey.ALINe working papers.
  • Malekmohammadi I (1999). Fundamentals of Agriculture and Natural Resources Extension and Education.Vol 2. University Publishing Center. Tehran. [In Persian].
  • Mehrotra S (2012) Monitoring, evaluation and performance management in South Asia: The challenge of building capacity. Evaluation Journal, 19(1): 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012471257
  • Naziris IA, Lagaros ND, Papaioannou K (2016) Optimized fire protection of cultural heritage structures based on the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Building Engineering, In Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.08.007
  • Petrini MA, Rocha JV, Brown JC, Bispo RC (2016) Using an analytic hierarchy process approach to prioritize public policies addressing family farming in Brazil. Land Use Policy, 51: 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.029
  • Ren P, Xu Z, Liao H (2016) Intuitionistic multiplicative analytic hierarchy process in group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101: 513-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.09.025
  • Ruiz-Padillo A, Torija AJ, Ramos-Ridao AF, Ruiz DP (2016) Application of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in multi-criteria decision in noise action plans: Prioritizing road stretches. Environmental Modelling & Software, 81: 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.009
  • Veisi H, Liaghati H, Alipour A (2016) Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Ecological Indicators, 60: 644-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.012
  • World Bank (2003) Monitoring and Evaluation: Measuring and Assessing Agricultural Development Programmes. Agricultural Investment Sourcebook, Module 11. Washington, D.C.
  • World Bank (2012) Gender Issues In Monitoring and Evaluation. In Agriculture International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Development Association or the World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.