Biological disinfection of sugar beet at storage bacteria-antagonists of pathogens of sugar beet root rot
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 2020 - Volume 14 Issue 1, pp. 535-543
  • Published Online: 09 Mar 2020
  • Article Views: 37 | Article Download: 38
  • Open Access Full Text (PDF)
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Arynova RA, Muslimov NZ, Atabayeva BS. Biological disinfection of sugar beet at storage bacteria-antagonists of pathogens of sugar beet root rot. Eurasia J Biosci. 2020;14(1), 535-543.

APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Arynova et al., 2020)
Reference: Arynova, R. A., Muslimov, N. Z., & Atabayeva, B. S. (2020). Biological disinfection of sugar beet at storage bacteria-antagonists of pathogens of sugar beet root rot. Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 14(1), 535-543.

Chicago
In-text citation: (Arynova et al., 2020)
Reference: Arynova, Rayhan A., Nurzhan Zh. Muslimov, and Bekzat S. Atabayeva. "Biological disinfection of sugar beet at storage bacteria-antagonists of pathogens of sugar beet root rot". Eurasian Journal of Biosciences 2020 14 no. 1 (2020): 535-543.

Harvard
In-text citation: (Arynova et al., 2020)
Reference: Arynova, R. A., Muslimov, N. Z., and Atabayeva, B. S. (2020). Biological disinfection of sugar beet at storage bacteria-antagonists of pathogens of sugar beet root rot. Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 14(1), pp. 535-543.

MLA
In-text citation: (Arynova et al., 2020)
Reference: Arynova, Rayhan A. et al. "Biological disinfection of sugar beet at storage bacteria-antagonists of pathogens of sugar beet root rot". Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, vol. 14, no. 1, 2020, pp. 535-543.

Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Arynova RA, Muslimov NZ, Atabayeva BS. Biological disinfection of sugar beet at storage bacteria-antagonists of pathogens of sugar beet root rot. Eurasia J Biosci. 2020;14(1):535-43.

Abstract

The search for antagonistically active cultures of bacilli to fungal and bacterial pathogens of sugar beet root rot was carried out. Mycelial fungi are represented by genera such as Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp., Penicillium spp., Alternaria spp., Mucor spp. et al. The study involved 44 cultures of bacilli to 10 microscopic fungi, 5 bacteria, 5 yeasts and 5 enterobacteria. We selected 14 working bacilli for further work, which have good antagonistic properties.

References

  • Aitbayev TE, Krasavina VK, Zhakashbayeva MB (2014) Preservation of domestic and foreign varieties of carrot and beet root crops in the South-East of Kazakhstan. Research, results. [Electronic resource]: https://articlekz.com, 18.04.18.
  • Alemayehu, Y., Adicha, A., Mengistu, M., & Eshetu, B. (2016). Assessments of market Oriented beef cattle fattening System under farmer management condition in South Omo zone of SNNPR. Current Research in Agricultural Sciences, 3(3), 31-45.
  • Dvorkina AA (1992) Microorganisms of beet crop rotations in the South-East of Kazakhstan: abst. of diss. of Ph.D. - Alma-Ata: - p.23.
  • Egorov NS (Ed.) (1985) Guide to practical classes in microbiology. M.: Moscow University Press, - p.653.
  • Holt J, Krieg N, Snite P, Staley J, Williams S (Ed.) (1997) 14 Determinant of Bergey’s bacteria. – M.: Mir,. - in 2 volumes: – p.800.
  • Irkitova AN, Kagan YaR, Sokolova GG (2012) Comparative analysis of methods for determining the antagonistic activity of lactic acid bacteria. Proceedings of Altay State University 3-1(75): 41-44.
  • Labinskaya AS (1978) Microbiology with the technique of microbiological research. M.: Medicine, – p.392.
  • Maui AA, Kozhabayev ZhI (2013) Influence of root rot on sugar beet productivity in the South-East of Kazakhstan. - [Electronic resource]: www.rusnauka.com/15_NPN_2013/Agricole/3_136214.doc.htm, 18.04.18.
  • Netrusov AI, Egorova MA, Zakharchuk LM (2005) Workshop on microbiology: Textbook for students of university. etc.; edited by A.I. Netrusov. – M.: Akademiya: – p. 608.
  • Skorodumov DI, Subbotin VV, Sidorov NA, Kostenko TS (2005) Microbiological diagnostics of bacterial diseases of animals. – M.: Izograf, - 656 p. - P. 18-22.
  • Stognienko OI, Vorontsova AI (2015) Species composition of sugar beet root rot pathogens at short-term storage in the field. Plant protection and quarantine 1: 26-28.
  • Sugar beet. - [Electronic resource]: www.ruf-2.ru/saharnaya_svekla, 18.04.18.
  • Sugar beet. - [Electronic resource]: www.vkusnoblog.net/products/saharnaya-svekla, 6.06.19.
  • Sviridov AV (2014) Protection of sugar beet root crops from root rot. Plant protection and quarantine 5: 29-30.
  • Sviridov AV, Kolomiets EI (2012) Bacteria-antagonists in the protection of sugar beet from root rot: monograph. Grodno: GSAU: - p.187.
  • The situation with sugar production in Kazakhstan was called catastrophic. - [Electronic resource]: https://informburo.kz/.../katastrofichnoy-nazvali-situaciyu-s-proizvodstvom-sahara-v-, 8.04.18.
  • Vegas EZS, Nieves B, Araque M et al. (2006) Outbreak of Infection With Acinetobacter Strain RUH 1139 in an Intensive Care Unit. Infection control and hospital epidemiology 27(4): 397–404.
  • Werle E, Schneider C, Renner M et al. (1994) Convenient single-step, one tube purification of PCR products for direct sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4354-4355.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.